|
STONEGLASS
BUILDING PRODUCTS LTD Executive
Summary of a feasibility study relating to the creation and operation of a television and
computer dismantling centre in June 2006 The study was largely funded by Staffordshire Environmental Fund via the Landfill Communities Fund 1. The intention of the study, largely
funded by the Staffordshire Environmental Fund through the Landfill Communities
Fund, was to provide a comprehensive appraisal of the technical and commercial
feasibility of establishing a waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)
disassembly and recycling hub in 2. The enterprise would ideally comprise
three grouped and interacting components: (i) a WEEE
disassembly plant built alongside (ii) a grinding/milling plant to process the
recovered glass from the WEEE waste-stream and supply it as primary feedstock
to (iii) a factory producing commercial building products using 3. A consortium of four partners, each
with the specialist technical knowledge and commercial experience pertinent to
different aspects of the proposed project, was assembled by the project
coordinator in a joint participation.
The participating partners and their responsibilities were as
follows: 1. The Electrical Recycling Company
(WEEE disassembly plant) 2. Powder Processing Design Services (waste
glass milling plant) 3. Glass Technology Services (legislation,
specifications and logistics) 4. Stoneglass
Building Products (lead-partner and project co-ordinator) 4. The study’s conclusions of the study
and each partner’s contribution can be summarised as follows: 5. The Electrical Recycling Company [ERC]
developed a plant design with the capacity to take-in and process annually a
mix of 250,000 television and computer monitors which would yield 1,300 tonnes
of panel glass. ERC’s
view, confirmed by its costing-model, is that the establishment of such a plant
in 6. Powder Processing Design Services
[PPDS] designed and costed two alternative sizes of
milling plant. One plant had a
throughput capacity of 60,000 tonnes of glass per annum whilst the other had a
throughput capacity of 15,000 tonnes per annum. Using current values for ‘processed’ glass,
the costings showed that the larger plant had a
viable ‘stand-alone’ capability whilst the reduced throughput of the smaller
plant significantly reduced its projected profitability. However, the partial substitution of
reconditioned second-hand equipment for new equipment in the plant’s layout
along with the possibility of marketing a coarse fraction of the milled glass
product to another industrial end use at a potentially high price,
had a significant and positive influence on the overall economics of both
plants. 7. Glass Technology Services [GTS]
conducted a detailed desk-top study of the legislative, political and economic
policies that still shaped the future supply pattern of WEEE components ahead
of the legislation’s implementation in April 2007. 8. The
feasibility study provides a framework for evaluating the potential success of
the proposed 9. In summary, this study has resulted in
a concise and favourable technical and commercial appraisal of the attractive
benefits of establishing a WEEE recycling hub in |